Combination of Hua Shi Bai Du granule (Q-14) and standard care in the treatment of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial.

China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China. China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Xiyuan Hospital, Beijing, China. Wuhan Jinyintan Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei, China. China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China. China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Institute of Chinese Materia Medica, Beijing, China. China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Guanganmen Hospital, Beijing, China. China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Chinese Materia Medica Resource Center, Beijing, China. China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China; China Center for Evidence-based Medicine of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China. Electronic address: huangluqi01@126.com.

Phytomedicine : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology. 2021;:153671

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Hua Shi Bai Du Granule (Q-14) plus standard care compared with standard care alone in adults with coronavirus disease (COVID-19). STUDY DESIGN A single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial. SETTING Wuhan Jinyintan Hospital, Wuhan, China, February 27 to March 27, 2020. PARTICIPANTS A total of 204 patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 were randomized into the treatment group and control group, consisting of 102 patients in each group. INTERVENTIONS In the treatment group, Q-14 was administered at 10 g (granules) twice daily for 14 days, plus standard care. In the control group, patients were provided standard care alone for 14 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE The primary outcome was the conversion time for the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral assay. Adverse events were analyzed in the safety population. RESULTS Among the 204 patients, 195 were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. A total of 149 patients (71 vs. 78 in the treatment and control groups, respectively) tested negative via the SARS-CoV-2 viral assay. There was no statistical significance in the conversion time between the treatment group and control group (Full analysis set: Median [interquartile range]: 10.00 [9.00-11.00] vs. 10.00 [9.00-11.00]; Mean rank: 67.92 vs. 81.44; P = 0.051). The recovery time for fever was shorter in the treatment group than in the control group. The disappearance rate of symptoms like cough, fatigue, and chest discomfort was significantly higher in the treatment group. In chest computed tomography (CT) examinations, the overall evaluation of chest CT examination after treatment compared with baseline showed that more patients improved in the treatment group. There were no significant differences in the other outcomes. CONCLUSION The combination of Q-14 and standard care for COVID-19 was useful for the improvement of symptoms (such as fever, cough, fatigue, and chest discomfort), but did not result in a significantly higher probability of negative conversion in the SARS-CoV-2 viral assay. No serious adverse events were observed. TRIAL REGISTRATION ChiCTR2000030288.

Methodological quality

Publication Type : Randomized Controlled Trial

Metadata

MeSH terms : Drugs, Chinese Herbal